Leading off today: Time has a way of changing perspective.
A soft drink company figured out almost immediately in the mid-1980s that "New Coke" wasn't such a swell idea.
Over time, Americans came to realize that rooting for Iraq in th Iran-Iraq war wasn't the way to go -- not that taking a "rooting" interest in anything so grave as war is ever particularly tasteful.
Macs went from being perceived as tech toys for the artsy crowd to status as reliable alternatives to the PC for business computing.
And Tiger Woods went from role model to ... well, I'll leave you to answer that as I try to keep this blog family friendly.
But here's one example where my own opinion has remained unwavering: national high school championships. I spoke out against the concept nearly a quarter of a century ago in one of my first columns for the Democrat and Chronicle when the subject was broached in basketball and remain generally opposed now.
I mention this because of the report from USA Today that the National Federation of State High School Associations could conduct its first championships -- in golf or tennis -- a little more than a year from now.
The National Federation board will hear a proposal at its annual meeting in July, with a number of individual sports under consideration as the beta test. President Ennis Proctor said the emphasis would be on sports that could be conducted during the summer because of concerns about students missing classroom time. Cost is also a consideration, so the organization would not be likely to move forward without reliable sponsorship from a responsible patron.
It's certainly reasonable for the National Federation to be cautious on both those counts.
If you've read this far and see no reason for them not to take a shot at pulling this off, let me offer up four letters that should make you reconsider for a moment: N-C-A-A.
The NCAA is a collection of individual schools and conferences, and it rules with the proverbial iron fist. It is judge, jury and executioner in disciplinary issues and does not have to be responsive to public opinion, evidenced by the fact that we have a bowl system rather than a genuine national championship in football.
In short, they have a lot of clout, to the point that you won't find very many people contend the NCAA has too little power in college sports.
Well, the National Federation is a collection of most of the statewide governing bodies across the U.S., and those entities in turn are collections of most of the schools in their respective states. Though the structure of the National Federation somewhat mimics that of the NCAA, the mission to this point does not. Sanctions against schools are meted out at the state and local levels rather than by the national body and there are no billion-dollar TV deals to be negotiated either.